Editorial owner: MCL Solar Knowledge Center

Review scope: Preliminary PV sizing for off-grid solar street lights. Final capacity requires location-specific solar data, model-specific electrical measurements, temperature review, orientation and controller limits.

Key conclusion

Solar panel size should be calculated from the measured nightly energy demand and the available solar resource, then adjusted for real system losses and the required recovery behavior. Dividing LED wattage by a fixed number is not a valid project method.

The calculation produces a preliminary array power. The proposed module must then be checked against controller voltage and current limits, available mounting area, orientation, shading, temperature and the battery charging requirement.

Inputs required before calculation

Step 1: calculate nightly energy demand

Calculate each operating stage separately:

Lighting energy (Wh/night) = sum of [measured power at each stage (W) x time at that stage (h)]

Then add auxiliary energy:

Total nightly load = lighting energy + controller energy + sensor energy + communications energy

Use measured system input power where available. LED board wattage alone can exclude driver and control losses.

Step 2: select the solar-resource input

Peak sun hours are an energy equivalent, not the number of daylight hours. A location may have a long day but limited usable solar energy because of clouds, haze, shading, orientation or seasonal conditions.

Use a location-specific dataset and state whether the calculation uses an annual average, a low-solar month, or another project-defined design period. NREL’s PVWatts and National Solar Radiation Database are useful references for preliminary solar-resource and loss modeling, although an off-grid street light still requires its own battery and controller model.

Step 3: apply a transparent derating model

A convenient preliminary formula is:

Required PV power (W) = total nightly load (Wh) / [design peak sun hours (h) x combined delivery factor]

The combined delivery factor represents the modeled effect of temperature, module tolerance, wiring, soiling, orientation, controller conversion and other applicable losses. Do not mislabel one universal value as an MPPT correction coefficient. MPPT is a controller operating method; it does not replace a project-specific loss model.

List the individual assumptions used to create the combined factor. NREL’s PVWatts documentation shows why system losses are modeled explicitly and warns that performance predictions contain assumptions and uncertainty.

Worked example

This example demonstrates the method only. It is not a product recommendation.

Preliminary PV power = 228 / (4.5 x 0.75) = 67.6 W

The result suggests that an array above 67.6 W should be evaluated. It does not automatically justify a specific commercial panel size. The next step is to check battery recovery, seasonal resource, panel tolerance, temperature, mounting area and controller limits. A project may select a larger array after those checks.

Battery recovery after low-solar days

A panel sized only to replace one average night’s energy may recover slowly after several poor-solar days. Recovery should be modeled separately:

Daily charging requirement = next-night load + planned recovery energy

The recovery period is a project decision. Faster recovery requires more available charging energy and may require a larger array or a different operating strategy. The controller’s maximum PV input voltage, charging current and thermal limits must not be exceeded.

Why oversizing is not unlimited

Additional panel capacity can improve recovery and low-solar resilience, but only within the electrical and mechanical design:

Common calculation errors

Procurement data to request

Sources and further reading

Use this calculation together with the battery guide and rainy-day autonomy guide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *